Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35252355›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2022

Fragment-Based Drug Discovery by NMR. Where Are the Successes and Where can It Be Improved?

Luca G Mureddu, Geerten W Vuister

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Advances in Cathepsin S Inhibition: Challenges and Breakthroughs in Drug Development.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Drugging the UndruggableMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luca G MuredduLeicester Institute of Structural and Chemical Biology, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Geerten W VuisterLeicester Institute of Structural and Chemical Biology, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council B20259Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E005071/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H004130/1Medical Research Council MR/L000555/1Medical Research Council MR/P00038X/1Medical Research Council MR/V000950/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last century, the definitions of pharmaceutical drug and drug discovery have changed considerably. Evolving from an almost exclusively serendipitous approach, drug discovery nowadays involves several distinct, yet sometimes interconnected stages aimed at obtaining molecules able to interact with a defined biomolecular target, and triggering a suitable biological response. At each of the stages, a wide range of techniques are typically employed to obtain the results required to move the project into the next stage. High Throughput Screening (HTS) and Fragment Based Drug Design (FBDD) are the two main approaches used to identify drug-like candidates in the early stages of drug discovery. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy has many applications in FBDD and is used extensively in industry as well as in academia. In this manuscript, we discuss the paths of both successful and unsuccessful molecules where NMR had a crucial part in their development. We specifically focus on the techniques used and describe strengths and weaknesses of each stage by examining several case studies. More precisely, we examine the development history from the primary screening to the final lead optimisation of AZD3839 interacting with BACE-1, ABT-199 interacting with BCL

Indexed as

BACE-1BCL-2Fragments Based Drug DiscoveryMCL-1NMR-FBDDVenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID35252355
PMCPMC8895297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.