ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Prediction Model of Immunosuppressive Medication Non-adherence for Renal Transplant Patients Based on Machine Learning Technology.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06161181 (Enhancing Therapy Adherence Among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Enhancing Therapy Adherence Among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: the Study Protocol
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bridging pediatric to adult care in cystinosis: a scoping review of healthcare transition of care protocols and a roadmap for future practice.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Modelling for Precision Dosing of Immunosuppressants in Kidney Transplantation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A study on the climate-driven spatiotemporal dynamics of influenza in Lanzhou spanning the COVID-19 era.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Machine learning approaches to predicting medication nonadherence: a scoping review.International journal of medical informatics · 2025Article
- Association between negative emotional states, self-regulation skills, and immunosuppressive medication adherence in liver or kidney transplant recipients: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Tele-based continuous care and treatment compliance in dialysis patients with and without depression: the serial mediating effect of nurse-patient relationship and health belief.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- 10 tips to improve adherence to immunosuppressive medication after kidney transplantation.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Review
- Temporal Shifts in Climate-Influenza Dynamics: A Multi-Subtype Analysis in Southern China Spanning the COVID-19 Era.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2025Article
- Article
- A Machine Learning Model to Predict Patients' Adherence Behavior and a Decision Support System for Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Development and validation of a LASSO-based prediction model for immunosuppressive medication nonadherence in kidney transplant recipients.Renal failure · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPredicting adherence to immunosuppressive medication (IM) is important to improve and design future prospective, personalized interventions in Chinese renal transplant patients (RTPs).
methodsA retrospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study was performed in 1,191 RTPs from October 2020 to February 2021 in China. The BAASIS was used as the standard to determine the adherence of the patients. Variables of the combined theory, including the general data, the HBM, the TPB, the BMQ, the PSSS and the GSES, were used to build the models. The machine learning (ML) models included LR, RF, MLP, SVM, and XG Boost. The SHAP method was used to evaluate the contribution of predictors to predicting the risk of IM non-adherence in RTPs.
resultsThe IM non-adherence rate in the derivation cohort was 38.5%. Ten predictors were screened to build the model based on the database. The SVM model performed better among the five models, with sensitivity of 0.59, specificity of 0.73, and average AUC of 0.75. The SHAP analysis showed that age, marital status, HBM-perceived barriers, use pill box after transplantation, and PSSS-family support were the most important predictors in the prediction model. All of the models had good performance validated by external data.
conclusionsThe IM non-adherence rate of RTPs was high, and it is important to improve IM adherence. The model developed by ML technology could identify high-risk patients and provide a basis for the development of relevant improvement measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.