Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35252158›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022

Traditional Chinese Medicine Compound-Loaded Materials in Bone Regeneration.

Guiwen Shi, Chaohua Yang, Qing Wang, Song Wang, Gaoju Wang, Rongguang Ao, Dejian Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guiwen ShiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Chaohua YangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Qing WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Song WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Gaoju WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Rongguang AoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Fudan University Pudong Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Dejian LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Fudan University Pudong Medical Center, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone is a dynamic organ that has the ability to repair minor injuries via regeneration. However, large bone defects with limited regeneration are debilitating conditions in patients and cause a substantial clinical burden. Bone tissue engineering (BTE) is an alternative method that mainly involves three factors: scaffolds, biologically active factors, and cells with osteogenic potential. However, active factors such as bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) are costly and show an unstable release. Previous studies have shown that compounds of traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) can effectively promote regeneration of bone defects when administered locally and systemically. However, due to the low bioavailability of these compounds, many recent studies have combined TCM compounds with materials to enhance drug bioavailability and bone regeneration. Hence, the article comprehensively reviewed the local application of TCM compounds to the materials in the bone regeneration

Indexed as

bone defectbone regenerationbone tissue engineeringdrug deliveryosteogenesistraditional Chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID35252158
PMCPMC8894853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.