ArticleFrontiers in public health2022
Risk Perception of Natural and Human-Made Disasters-Cross Sectional Study in Eight Countries in Europe and Beyond.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Psychological influences and implications for household disaster preparedness: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Freezing-Rain Experience and Household Preparedness: A Bayesian Network Analysis of Disruption Severity and Risk Normalization.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Disaster-Related Digital Technology Engagement and Preparedness Beliefs Among Primary Care Attendees: A Health Belief Model-Based Cross-Sectional Study in Türkiye.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Municipal Risk Communication and Public Trust: Reducing Counterproductive Behaviors Across Emergency Scenarios.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026Article
- Exploring public risk perception of multiple hazards through network analysis.Cell reports sustainability · 2025Article
- Have Coping Resources and Trust in State Institutions Helped Jews and Arabs to Overcome Stress During the Iron Swords War?European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025Article
- Positive relationship between education level and risk perception and behavioral response: A machine learning approach.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Natural multi-hazard risk perception and educational insights among Geography and Tourism students and graduates amid the Covid-19 pandemic.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2023Article
- Do first responders and populations perceive risks similarly? A comparative study of seven countries.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Social determinants and adherence to recommended COVID-19 vaccination among the Arab ethnic minority: A syndemics framework.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Each year, emergency and disaster situations claim a heavy toll in human lives and economic loss. Civilian populations that are more aware and prepared for emergencies are more resilient. The aim of this study was to explore similarities and differences in risk perception of emergencies and disasters across different societies and its association with individual resilience. A cross sectional study that explored attitudinal factors, as expressed by diverse samples of target countries across Europe and beyond, took place during the months of January-February 2021. Diverse samples (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.