SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2022
Clinical Significance of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Detection in Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unveiling the Prognostic Power of Circulating Tumor DNA in Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis.Cancer medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- The Evolving Role of Genomic Technologies in Multiple Myeloma: Implications for Diagnosis, Risk Stratification and Resistance.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- New Approaches for Measurable Residual Disease Assessment in Multiple Myeloma: Integrating NGS, Mass Spectrometry, and Next-Generation Flow Cytometry to Monitor Treatment Response.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2026Review
- DNA Sequencing of CD138 Cell Population Reveals TP53 and RAS-MAPK Mutations in Multiple Myeloma at Diagnosis.Cancers · 2024Article
- A Novel Tissue-Free Method to Estimate Tumor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Quantity Using Tumor Methylation Patterns.Cancers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) detection, a non-invasive method, appears promising for genetic analyses as well as quantitative assessment of tumor burden in patients with cancer. Although the analysis of cfDNA for clinical prognosis and monitoring disease burden in multiple myeloma (MM) has been recently studied, the results are unclear. In this meta-analysis, we explored the clinical significance of circulating cfDNA detection in patients with MM. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies published up until July 25, 2021. Diagnostic accuracy variables were calculated and analyzed using Meta-Disc, and prognostic data were analyzed using Review Manager. Overall, seven studies comprising 235 myeloma patients met our inclusion criteria. The overall sensitivity and specificity of cfDNA to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) were 0.58 and 0.91, respectively. Moreover, higher levels of cfDNA were associated with worse progression-free survival as well as with poor overall survival. Our meta-analysis revealed that ctDNA detection has an obvious advantage in terms of MRD detection specificity, but it showed no superiority over bone marrow assessment in terms of MRD detection sensitivity, and higher levels of cfDNA were indicative of worse prognosis in patients with MM. cfDNA detection is a non-invasive method and thus shows promise as a good alternative to BM biopsies for monitoring clonal evolution and tumor burden so as to guide the treatment of patients with MM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.