SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2022
Whole-Body MRI Is an Effective Imaging Modality for Hematological Malignancy Treatment Response Assessment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging evaluation of lymphoma in pregnancy with review of clinical assessment and treatment options.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
- The Diagnostic Efficiency of Quantitative Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Differentiating Medulloblastoma from Posterior Fossa Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) for assessment of hematological malignancies' therapeutic response.
methodsPubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched up to August 2021 to identify studies reporting the diagnostic performance of WB-MRI for the assessment of hematological malignancies' treatment response. A bivariate random-effects model was applied for the generation of the pooled diagnostic performance.
resultsFourteen studies with 457 patients with lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and sarcoma (very small proportion) were analyzed. Overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of WB-MRI were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.73-0.95) and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.73-0.93), respectively. Studies using whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (WB-DWI) showed higher sensitivity than those that did not (0.94 vs. 0.55, p = 0.02). The pooled concordance rate of WB-MRI to assess hematological malignancies' treatment response with reference standard was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.59-0.96). WB-MRI and PET/CT showed similar diagnostic performance (sensitivity [0.83 vs. 0.92, p = 0.11] and specificity [0.87 vs. 0.76, p = 0.73]).
conclusionWB-MRI has high diagnostic performance for hematological malignancies' treatment response assessment. The adding of WB-DWI is strongly associated with increased sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.