ArticleCureus2022
Comparison of Team-Based Learning Over Conventional Didactic Lecture Among Second-Year MBBS Students.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementing digital-supported team-based learning for large undergraduate cohort in a resource-limited setting: a pilot study developed through an international academic partnership.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Undergraduate medical students' perceptions of an interactive and collaborative cloud-based learning strategy: survey at a single institution.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Team-based learning (TBL) is an active and structured learning process. This study was undertaken to develop interest among the students over the subject and to analyze the academic performance over routine conventional lecture method of teaching. This was a comparative study organized to know the effectiveness of TBL over conventional didactic lecture (CDL) and also to assess the student's perception towards TBL. Methods This was an interventional study where second-year MBBS students took part. Students were divided into two groups and the same topic was discussed by using two different teaching-learning methods. Similar sessions were conducted with crossing over of groups for four different topics and assessments were done after each session simultaneously for both the groups and the results were analyzed. Results Assessment of each session has been counted and the mean marks with standard deviation have been tabulated for both groups A & B. The results were statistically significant for the TBL group. Students' perception was also evaluated by using 5-point Likert scale for both the teaching methods, which revealed statistically significant score for TBL over CDL with the a p-value of 0.001. Conclusion Overall, TBL was a good teaching-learning method according to the students' performance and perception. Interactive innovative and small-group sessions can be an effective tool to overcome the limitation of conventional method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.