ArticleCureus2022
Profiles of Whole Blood Transfusion Recipients at a Teaching Hospital in Lahore, Pakistan.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in the identification and prediction of adverse transfusion reactions(ATRs) and implications for clinical management: a systematic review of models and applications.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Blood transfusion plays a vital role in medical practice. Evaluation of blood utilization in a blood bank is a crucial step in good transfusion practice. It is the inception towards assessing the present and future demands for blood and also avoiding unnecessary transfusions. Methods Retrospective analysis of one-year data, available in the blood bank of Gulab Devi Hospital Lahore, was done to study blood transfusion practice. Issue registers were accessed to retrieve the required information such as gender, age, blood group, pre-transfusion Hemoglobin level, ward, clinical diagnosis, and indication for the transfusion. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 20 software. Frequency and percentages were used to summarize categorical demographics and clinical variables. Results A total of 1181 units were requested from the hospital during our study period. Majority of the requests were for the female patients (69%) of the reproductive age group (21 to 30 years). Blood group B positive was most frequent in our study population. Maximum requests were from reproductive health departments (39.9%). Surgery was the major diagnostic category to require blood transfusions (31.8%). Elective surgery constituted the major indication requiring blood transfusion at our hospital (41.3%). Conclusion Blood utilization patterns vary significantly within geographical regions, hospital to hospital, and according to clinical practices as well as patients' clinical findings. Moreover, diseases burden, level of organization, and advancement of healthcare facilities in various settings contribute to the significant contrast in blood utilization trends.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.