Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35251748›Full record

ReviewJournal of analysis and testing2022

Improved Strategies for CRISPR-Cas12-based Nucleic Acids Detection.

Miao Qiu, Xiao-Ming Zhou, Lei Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of analysis and testing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Towards deployable CRISPR-based nucleic acid detection.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ultrasensitive CRISPR/Cas12a-Based System for Detection ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  7. CRISPR-epigenetic crosstalk: From bidirectional regulation to therapeutic potential.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miao QiuInstitute for Brain Research and Rehabilitation, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631 China.
Xiao-Ming ZhouSchool of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631 China.
Lei LiuInstitute for Brain Research and Rehabilitation, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought great challenges to traditional nucleic acid detection technology. Thus, it is urgent to develop a more simple and efficient nucleic acid detection technology. CRISPR-Cas12 has signal amplification ability, high sensitivity and high nucleic acid recognition specificity, so it is considered as a nucleic acid detection tool with broad development prospects and high application value. This review paper discusses recent advances in CRISPR-Cas12-based nucleic acid detection, with an emphasis on the new research methods and means to improve the nucleic acid detection capability of CRISPR-Cas12. Strategies for improving sensitivity, optimization of integrated detection, development of simplified detection mode and improvement of quantitative detection capabilities are included. Finally, the future development of CRISPR-Cas12-based nucleic acids detection is prospected.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas12Integrated detectionNucleic acid detectionQuantitative detectionSensitivitySimplified detection mode

Identifiers

PMID35251748
PMCPMC8883004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.