ReviewJournal of ophthalmology2022
Posterior Capsule Opacification after Cataract Surgery via Implantation with Hydrophobic Acrylic Lens Compared with Silicone Intraocular Lens: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sinskey Hook-Guided Mechanical Peeling of Primary Posterior Capsular Plaque During Cataract Surgery.Cureus · 2026Article
- Strategic Design of Biocompatible, Glistening-Free, and Foldable Artificial Intraocular Lenses Based on Hydro-Amphiphilic Ternary Copolymers.Biomacromolecules · 2025Article
- Study of Visual Quality and Higher Order Aberrations in Early Posterior Capsular Opacification.Journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Application of Silicone in Ophthalmology: A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Effect of surface-modified intraocular lenses on long-term postoperative inhibition of posterior capsule opacification.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Seeing the Future: A Review of Ocular Therapy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Efficacy of cataract surgeries performed during blindness prevention programs in Chongqing, China: a multicenter prospective study.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) is the most popular material in cataract surgery. Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) is a long-term complication of cataract surgery. It can impair vision and adversely affect the prognosis of IOL delamination. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide an updated evaluation of long-term complications and visual function after implantation with hydrophobic acrylic and silicone intraocular lenses. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from January 2000 until March 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies were finally included. The main outcomes were PCO value and neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd : YAG) capsulotomy rate. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare hydrophobic acrylic and silicone IOLs during the follow-up period. Sensitivity analysis was also performed. The meta-analysis included a total of 17 studies. When the follow-up period was considered, the results of the analysis revealed higher PCO value (Group 3: standardized mean difference (SMD), -0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.90 to -0.28) and Nd : YAG capsulotomy rate (Group 3: risk ratio (RR), 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40-0.89) for hydrophobic acrylic IOLs than silicone IOLs during a long-term (≥6 years) follow-up. In conclusion, both the PCO value and the Nd : YAG capsulotomy rates were higher in hydrophobic acrylic IOLs group than the silicone IOLs group at long-term use (more than 6 years) after implantation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.