ArticleActa radiologica open2022
Geographical variations in the use of outpatient diagnostic imaging in Norway 2019.
Article in Acta radiologica open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- CT sinus imaging utilization in Norway: trends over time and variation by region, age, and sex.Research in health services & regions · 2026Article
- Temporal and geographical variations in musculoskeletal imaging: a register-based study in Norway with focus on potential low-value imaging.Research in health services & regions · 2025Article
- Geographical variations and potential low-value neuroimaging examinations in Norway from 2013 to 2022.Research in health services & regions · 2025Article
- Differences in Interfacility Transfer from Emergency Department and Inpatient Services for Inpatient Neurologic Care.The Neurohospitalist · 2024Article
- Temporal and geographical variations in diagnostic imaging in Norway.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Article
- Impact of an online training tool on individual and organizational resilience and mindfulness among radiological personnel in Norway.BMC research notes · 2023Article
- Drivers for low-value imaging: a qualitative study of stakeholders' perspectives in Norway.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- The use of low-value imaging: the role of referral practice and access to imaging services in a representative area of Norway.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGeographical variations in the use of outpatient imaging can reveal inappropriate use of radiological services. Knowledge about these variations is crucial in the strive for appropriate and improved services. PURPOSE: To investigate the geographical variations in outpatient diagnostic imaging and analyze variations for main groups of examinations and for specific examinations. MATERIAL AND
methodsData on outpatient radiological procedures registered at the Norwegian Health Economics Administration in Norway for 2019 were accessed with county-based population rates for age adjustment accessed through Statistics Norway. Age-adjusted rates were used to calculate high/low ratios, means, standard deviations, and coefficients of variation were calculated per 10,000 inhabitants.
resultsThere is high geographical variation for PET/CT and PET/MRI and moderate variation for neuroradiological outpatient examinations in Norway in 2019. Variations for the musculoskeletal systems and of thorax, abdomen, and vessels are almost 50%. We find high high-to-low ratios in CT-face (9.7), MRI-elbow joint (8.5), CT of the neck, thorax, abdomen, and pelvis (6.5) as well as MRI-prostate (6.2). Comparing with data from 2012-5, we find a reduction in variation for some examinations, such as MRI of the hip and MRI of the entire spine, and an increase in variations for others, such as CT of the face and MRI of the elbow joint.
conclusionDespite much attention to the problem, we demonstrate substantial variations in radiological services in Norway raising concern with respect to appropriateness, quality of care, equity, and justice. The findings provide important input for quality improvement in radiological services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.