Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35251694›Full record

ReviewFuture science OA2022

DBHR: a collection of databases relevant to human research.

Shahid Ullah, Wajeeha Rahman, Farhan Ullah, Gulzar Ahmad, Muhmmad Ijaz, Tianshun Gao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future science OA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shahid UllahS Khan Lab Mardan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6694-5590
Wajeeha RahmanS Khan Lab Mardan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Farhan UllahS Khan Lab Mardan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8929-9229
Gulzar AhmadS Khan Lab Mardan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6832-1685
Muhmmad IjazS Khan Lab Mardan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2272-6430
Tianshun GaoResearch Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0466-9081

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe achievement of the human genome project provides a basis for the systematic study of the human genome from evolutionary history to disease-specific medicine. With the explosive growth of biological data, a growing number of biological databases are being established to support human-related research.

objectiveThe main objective of our study is to store, organize and share data in a structured and searchable manner. In short, we have planned the future development of new features in the database research area. MATERIALS &

methodsIn total, we collected and integrated 680 human databases from scientific published work. Multiple options are presented for accessing the data, while original links and short descriptions are also presented for each database. RESULTS & DISCUSSION: We have provided the latest collection of human research databases on a single platform with six categories: DNA database, RNA database, protein database, expression database, pathway database and disease database.

conclusionTaken together, our database will be useful for further human research study and will be modified over time. The database has been implemented in PHP, HTML, CSS and MySQL and is available freely at https://habdsk.org/database.php.

Indexed as

DBHRDNA databasehuman databasehuman genomeprotein database

Identifiers

PMID35251694
PMCPMC8890137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.