Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35251680›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Post-emergency teleconsultations during COVID crisis: TELE-SCOPE tool's feedback and epidemiological analysis.

Emmanuelle Chavda, Laurence Guedon-Moreau, Lina Williatte, Enrique Cordova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emmanuelle ChavdaService d'accueil des urgences adultes, Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul, Lille, France.
Laurence Guedon-MoreauInstitut Coeur Poumon, CHU Lille, France.
Lina WilliatteFaculté de Droit Université Catholique de Lille, co-titulaire de la Chaire Droit et Ethique de la santé numérique, Lille, France.
Enrique CordovaService d'accueil des urgences adultes, Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul, Lille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4888-2618

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 pandemic spread quickly. Health professionals are facing new challenges and looking for new ways to provide care in the context of lockdown and physical distancing. The Saint Vincent de Paul Hospital has leveraged its recent post-emergency teleconsultation solution (TELE-SCOPE), to address some COVID situations. Thanks to the usual follow-up teleconsultation within 24 h after their emergency discharge and the introduction of an additional one six days after, the eligible patients are able to return home earlier. This article provides feedback on how teleconsultation helps manage such a crisis. We also present an analysis of the treated population. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study includes the cases of 239 patients presenting symptoms of COVID-19 infection with a COVID score <4 over a period from 16 March to 11 May 2020. These were patients from the emergency department (ED) or COVID units. We based our analysis on the patient's medical files and an individual survey.

resultsOne hundred and eighty-four teleconsultations (with video) and 143 phone calls were carried out. By the end of the teleconsultations, 92.9% were getting better and did not need further follow-up, 5.9% were reconvened to the ED, and 2.5% were hospitalized. No patient died, nor did get hospitalized in intensive care. In total, 95.6% are strongly or rather satisfied with the care provided by teleconsultation and 87.7% of patients are ready to reuse TELE-SCOPE as a means of monitoring in the context of the epidemic.

conclusionThe teleconsultations are efficient and safe to follow patients with confirmed or suspected non-severe COVID infection (COVID score <4) after discharge from the emergency room or hospitalisation. It protects the patients and practitioners. The patient's satisfaction is high.

Indexed as

COVIDdigital healthemergency roomgeneralsurveyteleconsultationtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35251680
PMCPMC8894957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.