ArticleNational science review2022
A single nucleotide mutation in the dual-oxidase 2 (
Article in National science review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conservation Evolutionary Biology: A Unified Framework Connecting the Past, Present, and Future of Biodiversity Conservation.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Review
- Giant panda seasonal adaptations in feeding strategies and blood physiology.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Sirenian genomes illuminate the evolution of fully aquatic species within the mammalian superorder afrotheria.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Diagnostic options, physiopathology, risk factors and genetic causes of permanent congenital hypothyroidism: A narrative review.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2024Review
- Molecular mechanisms of adaptive evolution in wild animals and plants.Science China. Life sciences · 2023Review
- The metabolic adaptation in wild vertebrates via omics approaches.Life metabolism · 2022Review
- MECHANISMS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY: The pathophysiology of transient congenital hypothyroidism.European journal of endocrinology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The giant panda (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.