Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35251669›Full record

ReviewAcute medicine & surgery

Artificial intelligence and machine learning in emergency medicine: a narrative review.

Brianna Mueller, Takahiro Kinoshita, Alexander Peebles, Mark A Graber, Sangil Lee

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05382000 (Evaluation of an Advanced Triage Tool for Gynecology and Obstetrics Emergencies Based on Artificial Intelligence Algorithms), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05382000 naunknown statusnot on this map

Evaluation of an Advanced Triage Tool for Gynecology and Obstetrics Emergencies Based on Artificial Intelligence Algorithms

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant PauRan2022 to 2024Enrolled450ConditionsEmergenciesArmsAdvanced triage tool for Gynecology and Obstetrics emergencies based on artificial intelligence algorithms.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Using natural language processing in emergency medicine health service research: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Perception and challenges of artificial intelligence (AI) in Emergency Medicine: A multi-country study in Sub-Saharan Africa.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Medicine: A Primer for the Nonexpert.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brianna MuellerDepartment of Business Analytics The University of Iowa Tippie College of Business Iowa City Iowa USA.
Takahiro KinoshitaPhilips Research North America Cambridge Massachusetts USA.
Alexander PeeblesDepartment of Emergency Medicine The University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine Iowa City Iowa USA.
Mark A GraberDepartment of Emergency Medicine The University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine Iowa City Iowa USA.
Sangil LeeDepartment of Emergency Medicine The University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine Iowa City Iowa USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8529-4500
University of Iowa · USPhilips (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe emergence and evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) has generated increasing interest in machine learning applications for health care. Specifically, researchers are grasping the potential of machine learning solutions to enhance the quality of care in emergency medicine.

methodsWe undertook a narrative review of published works on machine learning applications in emergency medicine and provide a synopsis of recent developments.

resultsThis review describes fundamental concepts of machine learning and presents clinical applications for triage, risk stratification specific to disease, medical imaging, and emergency department operations. Additionally, we consider how machine learning models could contribute to the improvement of causal inference in medicine, and to conclude, we discuss barriers to safe implementation of AI.

conclusionWe intend that this review serves as an introduction to AI and machine learning in emergency medicine.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligencedeep learningemergency medicinemachine learningprediction

Identifiers

PMID35251669
PMCPMC8887797
OpenAlexW4214764980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.