ReviewWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2022
Too big? A review of methods for removing large endometrial polyps in office minihysteroscopy - broadening the indications for the procedure in the COVID-19 pandemic.
Review in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of the Analgesia Nociception Index and Visual Analog Scale to Assess Pain During Hysteroscopy Under Local Anesthesia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Pain During Hysteroscopy Under Local Anesthesia, Including the Stages of the Procedure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hysteroscopy is the gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of endometrial polyps. For small polyps (less than 2 cm) minihysteroscopy can be performed in an office setting. Patients with polyps larger than 2 cm are usually referred for a standard resectoscope procedure in the operation room (OR) under general anaesthesia. Those patients are exposed to longer hospital stay and possible complications of the anaesthesia. Furthermore, they usually have longer contact with many medical staff members. Limiting the time of contact as well as the number of staff involved in the procedure is particularly important during the COVID-19 pandemic. For this reason, minihysteroscopy in an office setting should be the first choice in every possible indication. We present the methods that may be useful for removing even large polyps in minihysteroscopy. The advantages and disadvantages of every procedure are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.