ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2022
Role of magnetic resonance-high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) in uterine fibroids management: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrative Profiling of the Ovarian Reserve using Ultrasound and MRI Data by Comparative Analysis: A Systematic Review.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Pooled it
- Ablation of symptomatic uterine fibroids with the Mirabilis system for rapid noninvasive ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU): a prospective observational clinical study.La Radiologia medica · 2025Observational
- Occurrence and Risk Factors for Perioperative Treatment Discontinuation during Magnetic Resonance-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MR-HIFU) Therapy in Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids-A Retrospective Case-Control Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMagnetic resonance-high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) has revolutionized the treatment of Uterine fibroids. Usually, they are associated with prolonged heavy bleeding during the menstrual period, sacral pain, and increased frequency of UTIs, secondary dysmenorrhea, constipation, and pregnancy-associated problems. It also impacts usual activities, which lead to diminished quality of life and rising healthcare costs. Generally, surgery is the only choice for uterine fibroids; however, MR-HIFU is an entirely non-invasive novel therapy, preferred in pregnancy desiring females.
aimTo re-evaluate the efficacy of magnetic resonance-high intensity focused ultrasound (MRHIFU) therapy for uterine fibroids. MATERIAL AND
methodsRandomized clinical trials (RCTs), prospective or retrospective non-randomized, and cross-over studies that considered clinically symptomatic uterine fibroid treatment were included. Meta-analysis was performed using NCSS software, and data were analyzed at a 95% confidence level with a significance level of 0.05. In addition, the non-perfused volume percentage (NPV%), transformed Symptom Severity Score percentage change (tSSS change%), and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) were computed.
resultsThe overall effect of NPV% was 67.60%, where the 95% confidence interval ranged from 55.58% to 79.62%. The overall impact of tSSS% change was approximately 50% (0.54) with 95% CI of 0.41-0.66 of 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months in the included studies. There was a significant improvement in the health-related quality of life (HR-QoL).
conclusionsThe efficacy of MR-HIFU therapy was improved as treatment protocols aimed for total ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.