Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35251328›Full record

ReviewExperimental and therapeutic medicine2022

Clinical impact of wireless capsule endoscopy for small bowel investigation (Review).

Alin Gabriel Ionescu, Adina Dorina Glodeanu, Mihaela Ionescu, Sorin Ioan Zaharie, Ana Maria Ciurea, Andreea Loredana Golli, Nikolaos Mavritsakis, Didi Liliana Popa, Cristin Constantin Vere

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Definition of Skills and Roles of the Digestive Endoscopy Nurse: Italian Consensus of ANOTE-ANIGEA.Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alin Gabriel IonescuDepartment of Medical History, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Adina Dorina GlodeanuDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Mihaela IonescuDepartment of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Sorin Ioan ZaharieDepartment of Nephrology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Ana Maria CiureaDepartment of Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Andreea Loredana GolliDepartment of Public Health Management, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Nikolaos MavritsakisDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, '1 Decembrie 1918' University, 510009 Alba Iulia, Romania.
Didi Liliana PopaDepartment of Information and Communication Technology, University of Craiova, 200585 Craiova, Romania.
Cristin Constantin VereDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova · RO1 Decembrie 1918 University · ROUniversity of Craiova · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wireless capsule endoscopy is currently considered the gold standard in the investigation of the small bowel. It is both practical for physicians and easily accepted by patients. Prior to its development, two types of imaging investigations of the small bowel were available: radiologic and endoscopic. The first category is less invasive and comfortable for patients; it presents the ensemble of the small bowel, but it may imply radiation exposure. Images are constructed based on signals emitted by various equipment and require special interpretation. Endoscopic techniques provide real-time colored images acquired by miniature cameras from inside the small bowel, require interpretation only from a medical point of view, may allow the possibility to perform biopsies, but the investigation only covers a part of the small bowel and are more difficult to accept by patients. Wireless capsule endoscopy is the current solution that overcomes a part of the previous drawbacks: it covers the entire small bowel, it provides real-time images acquired by cameras, it is painless for patients, and it represents an abundant source of information for physicians. Yet, it lacks motion control and the possibility to perform biopsies or administer drugs. However, significant effort has been oriented in these directions by technical and medical teams, and more advanced capsules will surely be available in the following years.

Indexed as

endoscopymedical devicessmall bowel investigationsmall intestine pathologywireless capsule endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID35251328
PMCPMC8892621
OpenAlexW4210834546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.