Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35251301›Full record

ArticleApplied bionics and biomechanics2022

A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of the Impact of Different Configurations of Pedicle-Screw-Based Fixation in Thoracolumbar Compression Fracture.

Klaudia Szkoda-Poliszuk, Rafał Załuski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied bionics and biomechanics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effect of different cement distribution on the clinical efficacy of vertebral compression fractures in unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Klaudia Szkoda-PoliszukDepartment of Mechanics, Materials and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3934-2142
Rafał ZałuskiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1304-9562
Wroclaw Medical University · PLWrocław University of Science and Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this experimental study was to analyze the impact of applying different configurations of the transpedicular fixation system on selected mechanical parameters of the thoracolumbar spine under conditions of its instability (after simulated fracture). Five study groups were tested: physiological, with compression fracture of the vertebra, with two-segment fixation, with three-segment fixation, and with four-segment fixation. Each of the analyzed study groups was subjected to axial compression, flexion, and extension. Based on the conducted experimental tests, the mechanical parameters, i.e., stiffness coefficient and dissipation energy, were determined for all groups under consideration. The stiffness value of two-segment fixation is significantly lower than the physiological value (during flexion and extension). The use of long-segment fixation considered in two configurations (three- and four-segment fixation) may result in excessive stiffness of the system due to the high stiffness values achieved (approx. 25-30% higher than the physiological values in the case of compression and on average 60% higher in the case of flexion). The use of long-segment fixator design shows better results than short-segment fixation. Considering both biomechanical and clinical aspects, three-segment fixation seems to be a compromise solution as it saves the patient from more extensive stiffening of the spinal motion segments.

Identifiers

PMID35251301
PMCPMC8890884
OpenAlexW4213433055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.