Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35251244›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in nursing : JRN2021

Public health counselling following an HIV diagnosis among men who have sex with men: tensions between individual needs and health protection mandates.

Lauren Orser, Patrick O'Byrne

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in nursing : JRN, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lauren OrserDoctoral student, University of Ottawa, School of Nursing Ottawa, Canada.
Patrick O'ByrneProfessor, University of Ottawa, School of Nursing Ottawa, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Ontario, provincial regulations stipulate that public health units must complete post-test counselling with all persons newly diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus. Public health nurses conduct this follow-up and are responsible for ensuring appropriate surveillance and management of human immunodeficiency virus with the primary objective of reducing ongoing human immunodeficiency virus transmission in their health jurisdiction. To date, little research has explored the effectiveness of this mandatory public health counselling from the perspective of patients - the majority of whom are men who have sex with men.

aimsTo address gaps in public health nursing practice, a pilot study was conducted with men who have sex with men in Ottawa to explore their attitudes and experiences of receiving mandatory human immunodeficiency virus follow-up after their diagnosis.

methodsQualitative interviews were conducted and interpreted using thematic analysis.

resultsThis analysis revealed a contrariety between the needs of individuals and of public health units, with patients' perceiving their personal wishes to be secondary to public health mandates - and led patients to simultaneously want to evade, and be assisted by, public health nurses.

conclusionsPublic health units and nurses should consider adopting a more patient-centered approach to HIV case management, which incorporates patients' experiences of receiving an HIV diagnosis.

Indexed as

HIVmen who have sex with menpopulation surveillancepublic healthpublic health nursing

Identifiers

PMID35251244
PMCPMC8894996
OpenAlexW3105417865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.