Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35251165›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases2022

Detecting Latent Topics and Trends in Global Publications on Brucellosis Disease Using Text Mining.

Meisam Dastani, Jalal Mardaneh, Omid Pouresmaeil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Meisam DastaniInfectious Diseases Research Center, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5631-539X
Jalal MardanehDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Infectious Diseases Research Center, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9010-2518
Omid PouresmaeilDepartment of Microbiology and Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0548-2294

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBrucellosis is widespread globally and one of the most important zoonotic diseases. Therefore, to fully comprehend the disease and discover ways of prevention and treatment, researchers have conducted some research in this field. Hence, this study will focus on the topic trend of scientific publications of brucellosis.

methodsThis study is an applied research using text mining techniques with an analytical approach. The statistical population of the present research is all global publications related to brucellosis. For data extraction, the Scopus citation database was used in the period from 1900 to 2020. The main keywords for search strategy design have been extracted from consultation with thematic specialists and using MESH. Python programming language has been applied to analyze data and implement text mining algorithms.

resultsAccording to results, eight main topics of "Prevention," "Clinical symptoms," "Diagnosis," "Control," "Treatment," "Immunology," "Structural Features," and "Pathogenicity" have been identified for brucellosis publications. Moreover, the topics "Prevention" and "Pathogenicity" had the highest and lowest prevalence in the field of brucellosis over time, respectively.

conclusionThis study has revealed the topics published in the global publications of brucellosis; the findings can be useful for research centers and universities in determining research priorities in the field of brucellosis.

Identifiers

PMID35251165
PMCPMC8896154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.