Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35251131›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

Fusion Gene Detection Using Whole-Exome Sequencing Data in Cancer Patients.

Wenjiang Deng, Sarath Murugan, Johan Lindberg, Venkatesh Chellappa, Xia Shen, Yudi Pawitan, Trung Nghia Vu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Wenjiang DengDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sarath MuruganDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan LindbergDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Venkatesh ChellappaDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Xia ShenDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Yudi PawitanDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Trung Nghia VuDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEFudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several fusion genes are directly involved in the initiation and progression of cancers. Numerous bioinformatics tools have been developed to detect fusion events, but they are mainly based on RNA-seq data. The whole-exome sequencing (WES) represents a powerful technology that is widely used for disease-related DNA variant detection. In this study, we build a novel analysis pipeline called Fuseq-WES to detect fusion genes at DNA level based on the WES data. The same method applies also for targeted panel sequencing data. We assess the method to real datasets of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and prostate cancer patients. The result shows that two of the main AML fusion genes discovered in RNA-seq data, PML-RARA and CBFB-MYH11, are detected in the WES data in 36 and 63% of the available samples, respectively. For the targeted deep-sequencing of prostate cancer patients, detection of the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion, which is the most frequent chimeric alteration in prostate cancer, is 91% concordant with a manually curated procedure based on four other methods. In summary, the overall results indicate that it is challenging to detect fusion genes in WES data with a standard coverage of ∼ 15-30x, where fusion candidates discovered in the RNA-seq data are often not detected in the WES data and vice versa. A subsampling study of the prostate data suggests that a coverage of at least 75x is necessary to achieve high accuracy.

Indexed as

acute myeloid leukemiadiscordant readfusion geneprostate cancersplit readwhole exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID35251131
PMCPMC8888970
OpenAlexW4213173806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.