Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35251130›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2022

An Epigenetic Alphabet of Crop Adaptation to Climate Change.

Francesco Guarino, Angela Cicatelli, Stefano Castiglione, Dolores R Agius, Gul Ebru Orhun, Sotirios Fragkostefanakis, Julie Leclercq, Judit Dobránszki, Eirini Kaiserli, Michal Lieberman-Lazarovich and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Histone Maps inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 18 institutions in 14 countries.

Francesco GuarinoDipartimento di Chimica e Biologia "A. Zambelli", Università Degli Studi di Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Angela CicatelliDipartimento di Chimica e Biologia "A. Zambelli", Università Degli Studi di Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Stefano CastiglioneDipartimento di Chimica e Biologia "A. Zambelli", Università Degli Studi di Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Dolores R AgiusCentre of Molecular Medicine and Biobanking, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Gul Ebru OrhunBayramic Vocational College, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale, Turkey.
Sotirios FragkostefanakisDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology of Plants, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Julie LeclercqCIRAD, UMR AGAP, Montpellier, France.
Judit DobránszkiCentre for Agricultural Genomics and Biotechnology, FAFSEM, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Eirini KaiserliInstitute of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Michal Lieberman-LazarovichPlant Sciences Institute, Agricultural Research Organization Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion, Israel.
Merike SõmeraDepartment of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
Cecilia SarmientoDepartment of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
Cristina VettoriInstitute of Biosciences and Bioresources (IBBR), National Research Council (CNR), Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Donatella PaffettiDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Anna M G PomaDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Public Health, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Aquila, Italy.
Panagiotis N MoschouInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas, Heraklion, Greece.
Mateo GašparovićChair of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Sanaz YousefiDepartment of Horticultural Science, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.
Chiara VergataDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Margot M J BergerUMR Ecophysiologie et Génomique Fonctionnelle de la Vigne, Université de Bordeaux, INRAE, Bordeaux Science Agro, Bordeaux, France.
Philippe GallusciUMR Ecophysiologie et Génomique Fonctionnelle de la Vigne, Université de Bordeaux, INRAE, Bordeaux Science Agro, Bordeaux, France.
Dragana MiladinovićInstitute of Field and Vegetable Crops, National Institute of Republic of Serbia, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Federico MartinelliDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
University of Florence · ITUniversity of Salerno · ITTallinn University of Technology · EEAgricultural Research Organization · ILBu-Ali Sina University · IRÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi · TREcophysiologie et Génomique Fonctionnelle de la Vigne · FRFoundation for Research and Technology Hellas · GRGenetic Improvement and Adaptation of Mediterranean and Tropical Plants · FRGoethe University Frankfurt · DEInstitute of Biosciences and Bioresources · ITInstitute of Field and Vegetable Crops · RSUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversity of Debrecen · HUUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of L'Aquila · ITUniversity of Malta · MTUniversity of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop adaptation to climate change is in a part attributed to epigenetic mechanisms which are related to response to abiotic and biotic stresses. Although recent studies increased our knowledge on the nature of these mechanisms, epigenetics remains under-investigated and still poorly understood in many, especially non-model, plants, Epigenetic modifications are traditionally divided into two main groups, DNA methylation and histone modifications that lead to chromatin remodeling and the regulation of genome functioning. In this review, we outline the most recent and interesting findings on crop epigenetic responses to the environmental cues that are most relevant to climate change. In addition, we discuss a speculative point of view, in which we try to decipher the "epigenetic alphabet" that underlies crop adaptation mechanisms to climate change. The understanding of these mechanisms will pave the way to new strategies to design and implement the next generation of cultivars with a broad range of tolerance/resistance to stresses as well as balanced agronomic traits, with a limited loss of (epi)genetic variability.

Indexed as

abiotic stressesadaptationclimate changeenvironmental stressesepigenetic codeepigenetics

Identifiers

PMID35251130
PMCPMC8888914
OpenAlexW4212920286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.