ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022
Benchmark of Data Processing Methods and Machine Learning Models for Gut Microbiome-Based Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- A data-driven universal gut microbiome health assessment: a machine learning framework trained on large metagenomic data.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- From dysbiosis to precision medicine: targeting the microbial-metabolic axis in IBD management.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Widespread deep-sea microorganisms in subseafloor geochemical cycling.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- GlobalISME communications · 2026Article
- Detecting signatures underlying the composition of biological data.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Evaluation of attitudes of university students towards artificial intelligence using data mining methods.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Uncertainty Modeling Outperforms Machine Learning for Microbiome Data Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Effects of data transformation and model selection on feature importance in microbiome classification data.Microbiome · 2025Article
- Utility of Machine Learning to Characterize Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis and Its Clinical Implications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Review
- Benchmarking and optimizing microbiome-based bioinformatics workflow for non-invasive detection of intestinal tumors.Microbiome research reports · 2025Article
- Beyond microbial abundance: metadata integration enhances disease prediction in human microbiome studies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Advancing time-since-interval estimation for clandestine graves: a forensic ecogenomics perspective into burial and translocation timelines using massively parallel sequencing.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Skin microbiome differences in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, other cancers, and healthy controls: a pilot study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- DeepPhylo: Phylogeny-Aware Microbial Embeddings Enhanced Predictive Accuracy in Human Microbiome Data Analysis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Nine (not so simple) steps: a practical guide to using machine learning in microbial ecology.mBio · 2024Review
- A Machine Learning-Based Diagnostic Model for Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis Utilizing Fecal Microbiome Analysis.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Potential Oral Microbial Markers for Differential Diagnosis of Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis Using Machine Learning Models.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Conditional Forest Models Built Using Metagenomic Data Accurately PredictedMicrobiology spectrum · 2023Article
- PLSDA-batch: a multivariate framework to correct for batch effects in microbiome data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Overview of data preprocessing for machine learning applications in human microbiome research.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) wait months and undergo numerous invasive procedures between the initial appearance of symptoms and receiving a diagnosis. In order to reduce time until diagnosis and improve patient wellbeing, machine learning algorithms capable of diagnosing IBD from the gut microbiome's composition are currently being explored. To date, these models have had limited clinical application due to decreased performance when applied to a new cohort of patient samples. Various methods have been developed to analyze microbiome data which may improve the generalizability of machine learning IBD diagnostic tests. With an abundance of methods, there is a need to benchmark the performance and generalizability of various machine learning pipelines (from data processing to training a machine learning model) for microbiome-based IBD diagnostic tools. We collected fifteen 16S rRNA microbiome datasets (7,707 samples) from North America to benchmark combinations of gut microbiome features, data normalization and transformation methods, batch effect correction methods, and machine learning models. Pipeline generalizability to new cohorts of patients was evaluated with two binary classification metrics following leave-one-dataset-out cross (LODO) validation, where all samples from one study were left out of the training set and tested upon. We demonstrate that taxonomic features processed with a compositional transformation method and batch effect correction with the naive zero-centering method attain the best classification performance. In addition, machine learning models that identify non-linear decision boundaries between labels are more generalizable than those that are linearly constrained. Lastly, we illustrate the importance of generating a curated training dataset to ensure similar performance across patient demographics. These findings will help improve the generalizability of machine learning models as we move towards non-invasive diagnostic and disease management tools for patients with IBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.