Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35251123›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

Benchmark of Data Processing Methods and Machine Learning Models for Gut Microbiome-Based Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Ryszard Kubinski, Jean-Yves Djamen-Kepaou, Timur Zhanabaev, Alex Hernandez-Garcia, Stefan Bauer, Falk Hildebrand, Tamas Korcsmaros, Sani Karam, Prévost Jantchou, Kamran Kafi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. GlobalISME communications · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ryszard KubinskiPhyla Technologies Inc, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Jean-Yves Djamen-KepaouPhyla Technologies Inc, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Timur ZhanabaevPhyla Technologies Inc, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Alex Hernandez-GarciaMila, Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute, University of Montreal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Stefan BauerMax Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen, Germany.
Falk HildebrandGut Microbes and Health, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Tamas KorcsmarosGut Microbes and Health, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Sani KaramPhyla Technologies Inc, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Prévost JantchouCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Kamran KafiPhyla Technologies Inc, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Ryan D MartinPhyla Technologies Inc, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CAEarlham Institute · GBMax Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems · DEQuadram Institute · GBUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/F/000PR10353Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/F/000PR10355Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/T/000PR9817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) wait months and undergo numerous invasive procedures between the initial appearance of symptoms and receiving a diagnosis. In order to reduce time until diagnosis and improve patient wellbeing, machine learning algorithms capable of diagnosing IBD from the gut microbiome's composition are currently being explored. To date, these models have had limited clinical application due to decreased performance when applied to a new cohort of patient samples. Various methods have been developed to analyze microbiome data which may improve the generalizability of machine learning IBD diagnostic tests. With an abundance of methods, there is a need to benchmark the performance and generalizability of various machine learning pipelines (from data processing to training a machine learning model) for microbiome-based IBD diagnostic tools. We collected fifteen 16S rRNA microbiome datasets (7,707 samples) from North America to benchmark combinations of gut microbiome features, data normalization and transformation methods, batch effect correction methods, and machine learning models. Pipeline generalizability to new cohorts of patients was evaluated with two binary classification metrics following leave-one-dataset-out cross (LODO) validation, where all samples from one study were left out of the training set and tested upon. We demonstrate that taxonomic features processed with a compositional transformation method and batch effect correction with the naive zero-centering method attain the best classification performance. In addition, machine learning models that identify non-linear decision boundaries between labels are more generalizable than those that are linearly constrained. Lastly, we illustrate the importance of generating a curated training dataset to ensure similar performance across patient demographics. These findings will help improve the generalizability of machine learning models as we move towards non-invasive diagnostic and disease management tools for patients with IBD.

Indexed as

batch effect reductiondata normalizationgut microbiomeinflammatory bowel diseasemachine learningPICRUSt2QIIME2

Identifiers

PMID35251123
PMCPMC8895431
OpenAlexW4225983369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.