Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35251119›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021

Predicting Mutational Status of Driver and Suppressor Genes Directly from Histopathology With Deep Learning: A Systematic Study Across 23 Solid Tumor Types.

Chiara Maria Lavinia Loeffler, Nadine T Gaisa, Hannah Sophie Muti, Marko van Treeck, Amelie Echle, Narmin Ghaffari Laleh, Christian Trautwein, Lara R Heij, Heike I Grabsch, Nadina Ortiz Bruechle and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review of Molecular Technologies for Investigating Canine Cancer.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chiara Maria Lavinia LoefflerDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Nadine T GaisaInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Hannah Sophie MutiDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Marko van TreeckDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Amelie EchleDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Narmin Ghaffari LalehDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Christian TrautweinDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Lara R HeijInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Heike I GrabschDepartment of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Nadina Ortiz BruechleInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Jakob Nikolas KatherDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last four years, advances in Deep Learning technology have enabled the inference of selected mutational alterations directly from routine histopathology slides. In particular, recent studies have shown that genetic changes in clinically relevant driver genes are reflected in the histological phenotype of solid tumors and can be inferred by analysing routine Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained tissue sections with Deep Learning. However, these studies mostly focused on selected individual genes in selected tumor types. In addition, genetic changes in solid tumors primarily act by changing signaling pathways that regulate cell behaviour. In this study, we hypothesized that Deep Learning networks can be trained to directly predict alterations of genes and pathways across a spectrum of solid tumors. We manually outlined tumor tissue in H&E-stained tissue sections from 7,829 patients with 23 different tumor types from The Cancer Genome Atlas. We then trained convolutional neural networks in an end-to-end way to detect alterations in the most clinically relevant pathways or genes, directly from histology images. Using this automatic approach, we found that alterations in 12 out of 14 clinically relevant pathways and numerous single gene alterations appear to be detectable in tissue sections, many of which have not been reported before. Interestingly, we show that the prediction performance for single gene alterations is better than that for pathway alterations. Collectively, these data demonstrate the predictability of genetic alterations directly from routine cancer histology images and show that individual genes leave a stronger morphological signature than genetic pathways.

Indexed as

artificail intelligence (AI)cancer pathwaycancer pathway genesdeep learninggeneticTCGA

Identifiers

PMID35251119
PMCPMC8889144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.