ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021
Development and Performance Evaluation of a Novel Ancestry Informative DIP Panel for Continental Origin Inference.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ancestry estimation: Methodological evolution and forensic implications.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Review
- Advancements in Modern Nucleic Acid-Based Multiplex Testing Methodologies for the Diagnosis of Swine Infectious Diseases.Veterinary sciences · 2025Review
- Dissecting the genetic admixture and forensic signatures of ethnolinguistically diverse Chinese populations via a 114-plex NGS InDel panel.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Ancestral Information Analysis of Chinese Korean Ethnic Group via a Novel Multiplex DIP System.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023Article
- Insertion/deletion polymorphism for genetic background and forensic performance exploration of the Sui group from Guizhou.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ancestry informative markers (AIMs) are useful to infer individual biogeographical ancestry and to estimate admixture proportions of admixed populations or individuals. Although a growing number of AIM panels for forensic ancestry origin analyses were developed, they may not efficiently infer the ancestry origins of most populations in China. In this study, a set of 52 ancestry informative deletion/insertion polymorphisms (AIDIPs) were selected with the aim of effectively differentiate continental and partial Chinese populations. All of the selected markers were successfully incorporated into a single multiplex PCR panel, which could be conveniently and efficiently detected on capillary electrophoresis platforms. Genetic distributions of the same 50 AIDIPs in different continental populations revealed that most loci showed high genetic differentiations between East Asian populations and other continental populations. Population genetic analyses of different continental populations indicated that these 50 AIDIPs could clearly discriminate East Asian, European, and African populations. In addition, the 52 AIDIPs also exhibited relatively high cumulative discrimination power in the Eastern Han population, which could be used as a supplementary tool for forensic investigation. Furthermore, the Eastern Han population showed close genetic relationships with East Asian populations and high ancestral components from East Asian populations. In the future, we need to investigate genetic distributions of these 52 AIDIPs in Chinese Han populations in different regions and other ethnic groups, and further evaluate the power of these loci to differentiate different Chinese populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.