Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35251100›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2022

Raffinose Family Oligosaccharides: Friend or Foe for Human and Plant Health?

Dinakaran Elango, Karthika Rajendran, Liza Van der Laan, Sheelamary Sebastiar, Joscif Raigne, Naveen A Thaiparambil, Noureddine El Haddad, Bharath Raja, Wanyan Wang, Antonella Ferela and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
20.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 193 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Dinakaran ElangoDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Karthika RajendranVIT School of Agricultural Innovations and Advanced Learning, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
Liza Van der LaanDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Sheelamary SebastiarDivision of Crop Improvement, ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, India.
Joscif RaigneDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Naveen A ThaiparambilSchool of Biosciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
Noureddine El HaddadInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, Rabat, Morocco.
Bharath RajaSchool of Biosciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
Wanyan WangEcosystem Science and Management, Penn State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Antonella FerelaDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Kevin O ChiteriDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Mahendar ThudiDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, India.
Rajeev K VarshneyInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India.
Surinder ChopraDepartment of Plant Science, Penn State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Arti SinghDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Asheesh K SinghDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Iowa State University · USVellore Institute of Technology University · INPennsylvania State University · USCentral Agricultural University · INInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics · INMohammed V University · MASugarcane Breeding Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFOs) are widespread across the plant kingdom, and their concentrations are related to the environment, genotype, and harvest time. RFOs are known to carry out many functions in plants and humans. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of RFOs, including their beneficial and anti-nutritional properties. RFOs are considered anti-nutritional factors since they cause flatulence in humans and animals. Flatulence is the single most important factor that deters consumption and utilization of legumes in human and animal diets. In plants, RFOs have been reported to impart tolerance to heat, drought, cold, salinity, and disease resistance besides regulating seed germination, vigor, and longevity. In humans, RFOs have beneficial effects in the large intestine and have shown prebiotic potential by promoting the growth of beneficial bacteria reducing pathogens and putrefactive bacteria present in the colon. In addition to their prebiotic potential, RFOs have many other biological functions in humans and animals, such as anti-allergic, anti-obesity, anti-diabetic, prevention of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and cryoprotection. The wide-ranging applications of RFOs make them useful in food, feed, cosmetics, health, pharmaceuticals, and plant stress tolerance; therefore, we review the composition and diversity of RFOs, describe the metabolism and genetics of RFOs, evaluate their role in plant and human health, with a primary focus in grain legumes.

Indexed as

flatulencegalactinol synthasegrain legume cropsprebiotic carbohydratesα-galactosides

Identifiers

PMID35251100
PMCPMC8891438
OpenAlexW4213252728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.