Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35250992›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2022

The Risk of Adverse Effects of TNF-α Inhibitors in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Bei He, Yun Li, Wen-Wen Luo, Xuan Cheng, Huai-Rong Xiang, Qi-Zhi Zhang, Jie He, Wen-Xing Peng

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Food science & nutrition · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Serum TGF-Journal of immunology research · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bei HeDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yun LiDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Wen-Wen LuoDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xuan ChengDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Huai-Rong XiangDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Qi-Zhi ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jie HeDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Wen-Xing PengDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University · CNCentral South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the safety of each anti-TNF therapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and then make the best choice in clinical practice.

methodsWe searched PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. The deadline for retrieval is August 2021. The ORs, Confidence Intervals (CIs), and p values were calculated by STATA.16.0 software for assessment.

result72 RCTs involving 28332 subjects were included. AEs were more common with adalimumab combined disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) compared with placebo (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.06, 2.42), DMARDs (1.28, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.52), etanercept combined DMARDs (1.32, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.67); certolizumab combined DMARDs compared with placebo (1.63, 95% CI: 1.07, 2.46), DMARDs (1.30, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.54), etanercept combined DMARDs (1.34, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.70). In SAEs, comparisons between treatments showed adalimumab (0.20, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.59), etanercept combined DMARDs (0.39, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.96), golimumab (0.19, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.77), infliximab (0.15, 95% CI: 0.03,0.71) decreased the risk of SAEs compared with golimumab combined DMARDs. In infections, comparisons between treatments showed adalimumab combined DMARDs (0.59, 95% CI: 0.37, 0.95), etanercept (0.49, 95% CI: 0.28, 0.88), etanercept combined DMARDs (0.56, 95% CI: 0.35, 0.91), golimumab combined DMARDs (0.51, 95% CI: 0.31, 0.83) decreased the risk of infections compared with infliximab combined DMARDs. No evidence indicated that the use of TNF-α inhibitors influenced the risk of serious infections, malignant tumors.

conclusionIn conclusion, we regard etanercept monotherapy as the optimal choice for RA patients in clinical practice when the efficacy is similar. Conversely, certolizumab + DMARDs therapy is not recommended. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: identifier PROSPERO CRD42021276176.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidAdalimumabCertolizumab PegolEtanerceptHumansInfliximabTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAdalimumabAntirheumatic AgentsCertolizumab PegolEtanerceptInfliximabTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaTumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitorsadverse effectsnetwork meta-analysisrheumatoid arthritisserious adverse eventsTNF-α inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID35250992
PMCPMC8888889
OpenAlexW4213299563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.