Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35250823›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Convolutional Neural Networks Enable Robust Automatic Segmentation of the Rat Hippocampus in MRI After Traumatic Brain Injury.

Riccardo De Feo, Elina Hämäläinen, Eppu Manninen, Riikka Immonen, Juan Miguel Valverde, Xavier Ekolle Ndode-Ekane, Olli Gröhn, Asla Pitkänen, Jussi Tohka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Riccardo De FeoA. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Elina HämäläinenA. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Eppu ManninenA. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Riikka ImmonenA. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Juan Miguel ValverdeA. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Xavier Ekolle Ndode-EkaneA. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Olli GröhnA. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Asla PitkänenA. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Jussi TohkaA. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Registration-based methods are commonly used in the automatic segmentation of magnetic resonance (MR) brain images. However, these methods are not robust to the presence of gross pathologies that can alter the brain anatomy and affect the alignment of the atlas image with the target image. In this work, we develop a robust algorithm, MU-Net-R, for automatic segmentation of the normal and injured rat hippocampus based on an ensemble of U-net-like Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). MU-Net-R was trained on manually segmented MR images of sham-operated rats and rats with traumatic brain injury (TBI) by lateral fluid percussion. The performance of MU-Net-R was quantitatively compared with methods based on single and multi-atlas registration using MR images from two large preclinical cohorts. Automatic segmentations using MU-Net-R and multi-atlas registration were of excellent quality, achieving cross-validated Dice scores above 0.90 despite the presence of brain lesions, atrophy, and ventricular enlargement. In contrast, the performance of single-atlas segmentation was unsatisfactory (cross-validated Dice scores below 0.85). Interestingly, the registration-based methods were better at segmenting the contralateral than the ipsilateral hippocampus, whereas MU-Net-R segmented the contralateral and ipsilateral hippocampus equally well. We assessed the progression of hippocampal damage after TBI by using our automatic segmentation tool. Our data show that the presence of TBI, time after TBI, and whether the hippocampus was ipsilateral or contralateral to the injury were the parameters that explained hippocampal volume.

Indexed as

brain MRICNNdeep learningratregistrationsegmentationTBIU-net

Identifiers

PMID35250823
PMCPMC8891699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.