ArticleFrontiers in neurology2021
Etiology and Clinical Features of Diplopia in South China: Analysis of 303 Cases.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inhibition of tRNA fragments dysregulated in human mTLE exacerbates pathology and seizure activity.Acta neuropathologica · 2026Article
- Optimal timing for cataract surgery in patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Blood-repellent and anti-corrosive surface by spin-coated SWCNT layer on intravascular stent materials.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2023Article
- Defects and asymmetries in the visual pathway of non-human primates with natural strabismus and amblyopia.Zoological research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo provide a new classification system for diplopia and evaluate the etiology and clinical features of diplopia subtypes in south China.
methodsIn this retrospective study, all patients presenting with diplopia over the period from 2012 to 2014 in south China were reviewed. Patients were categorized into 3 groups according to their extraocular muscle (EOM) dysfunction: single EOM (sEOM), multiple EOMs (mEOMs), and a comitant strabismus group. Clinical data evaluated included age, sex, medical history, etiology and duration of diplopia, ocular alignment, and ocular motility.
resultsA total of 303 patients were enrolled. The most common type of EOM dysfunction was sEOM (158 cases, 52.1%), followed by mEOMs (
conclusionsThis new classification system for assessing diplopia as based on EOM dysfunction represents an easy-to-follow approach that can be readily adapted for the clinical use. While microangiopathy and trauma represent common etiologies of diplopia, both orbital diseases and NPC-associated diplopia also warrant special attention when assessing diplopia within patients in south China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.