Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35250764›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

A Fertile Ground for Ambiguities: Casual Sexual Relationships Among Portuguese Emerging Adults.

Rita Luz, Maria-João Alvarez, Cristina A Godinho, Cicero R Pereira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Longitudinal Relationships among Casual Sex and Psychological Well-Being in Chinese College Student.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Multiple Casual Sex Scripts: Shared Beliefs about Behavior among Portuguese Emerging Adults.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rita LuzFaculdade de Psicologia, CICPSI, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Maria-João AlvarezFaculdade de Psicologia, CICPSI, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Cristina A GodinhoCatólica Research Centre for Psychological, Family and Social Wellbeing, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Cicero R PereiraInstituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
University of Lisbon · PTIscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa · PTUniversidade Federal da Paraíba · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Casual sexual relationships (CSRs) are frequent relationship experiences in young adulthood that provide opportunities for many to explore sexual relationships and to construct their sexual identity. Empirical research on casual sex is still lacking outside North-American countries, despite evidence pointing to the need to contextualize sexual interactions in their own sociocultural context. In order to better understand casual sexual relationships, these should be examined in with novel samples in other countries where a "hookup culture" as it is described in the North-American university campus is apparently absent. Through a qualitative study, we explored what casual sexual relationships consist of according to the perceptions of Portuguese college students (

Indexed as

casual sexcasual sexual relationshipscollege studentsemerging adultssexual behaviorsociocultural context

Identifiers

PMID35250764
PMCPMC8894867
OpenAlexW4212799086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.