Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35250570›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2022

Metabolic Consequences of Developmental Exposure to Polystyrene Nanoplastics, the Flame Retardant BDE-47 and Their Combination in Zebrafish.

Raphaël Chackal, Tyler Eng, Emille M Rodrigues, Sara Matthews, Florence Pagé-Lariviére, Stephanie Avery-Gomm, Elvis Genbo Xu, Nathalie Tufenkji, Eva Hemmer, Jan A Mennigen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Raphaël ChackalDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Tyler EngDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Emille M RodriguesDepartment of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Sara MatthewsDepartment of Chemical Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Florence Pagé-LariviéreNational Wildlife Research Center, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Stephanie Avery-GommNational Wildlife Research Center, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Elvis Genbo XuDepartment of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Nathalie TufenkjiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Eva HemmerDepartment of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Jan A MennigenDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CAEnvironment and Climate Change Canada · CAMcGill University · CAUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-use plastic production is higher now than ever before. Much of this plastic is released into aquatic environments, where it is eventually weathered into smaller nanoscale plastics. In addition to potential direct biological effects, nanoplastics may also modulate the biological effects of hydrophobic persistent organic legacy contaminants (POPs) that absorb to their surfaces. In this study, we test the hypothesis that developmental exposure (0-7 dpf) of zebrafish to the emerging contaminant polystyrene (PS) nanoplastics (⌀100 nm; 2.5 or 25 ppb), or to environmental levels of the legacy contaminant and flame retardant 2,2',4,4'-Tetrabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-47; 10 ppt), disrupt organismal energy metabolism. We also test the hypothesis that co-exposure leads to increased metabolic disruption. The uptake of nanoplastics in developing zebrafish was validated using fluorescence microscopy. To address metabolic consequences at the organismal and molecular level, metabolic phenotyping assays and metabolic gene expression analysis were used. Both PS and BDE-47 affected organismal metabolism alone and in combination. Individually, PS and BDE-47 exposure increased feeding and oxygen consumption rates. PS exposure also elicited complex effects on locomotor behaviour with increased long-distance and decreased short-distance movements. Co-exposure of PS and BDE-47 significantly increased feeding and oxygen consumption rates compared to control and individual compounds alone, suggesting additive or synergistic effects on energy balance, which was further supported by reduced neutral lipid reserves. Conversely, molecular gene expression data pointed to a negative interaction, as co-exposure of high PS generally abolished the induction of gene expression in response to BDE-47. Our results demonstrate that co-exposure to emerging nanoplastic contaminants and legacy contaminants results in cumulative metabolic disruption in early development in a fish model relevant to eco- and human toxicology.

Indexed as

brominated flame retardantscumulative effectsemerging contaminantenergy metabolismgene expressionlegacy contaminantsnanoplastics

Identifiers

PMID35250570
PMCPMC8888882
OpenAlexW4213142275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.