Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35250525›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2022

Parameter Estimation of Two Spiking Neuron Models With Meta-Heuristic Optimization Algorithms.

Amr M AbdelAty, Mohammed E Fouda, Ahmed Eltawil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amr M AbdelAtyEngineering Mathematics and Physics Department, Faculty of Engineering, Fayoum University, Faiyum, Egypt.
Mohammed E FoudaCenter for Embedded & Cyber-Physical Systems, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Ahmed EltawilComputer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The automatic fitting of spiking neuron models to experimental data is a challenging problem. The integrate and fire model and Hodgkin-Huxley (HH) models represent the two complexity extremes of spiking neural models. Between these two extremes lies two and three differential-equation-based models. In this work, we investigate the problem of parameter estimation of two simple neuron models with a sharp reset in order to fit the spike timing of electro-physiological recordings based on two problem formulations. Five optimization algorithms are investigated; three of them have not been used to tackle this problem before. The new algorithms show improved fitting when compared with the old ones in both problems under investigation. The improvement in fitness function is between 5 and 8%, which is achieved by using the new algorithms while also being more consistent between independent trials. Furthermore, a new problem formulation is investigated that uses a lower number of search space variables when compared to the ones reported in related literature.

Indexed as

adaptive exponential (AdEx) integrate and firecuckoo search optimizerin-vitro dataleaky integrate and fire (LIF)marine predator algorithmmeta-heuristic optimization algorithmsspiking neuron model

Identifiers

PMID35250525
PMCPMC8888432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.