ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2021
Visual Mismatch Negativity: A Mini-Review of Non-pathological Studies With Special Populations and Stimuli.
Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experience-Tuned Predictive Coding in Monocultural Brains: A Visual Mismatch Response Study.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Automatic pairing of real-world stimuli in younger and older adults: An event-related potential study.PloS one · 2026Article
- The Somatosensory Mismatch Negativity.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Review
- Automatic sensory change processing in adults with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder: a visual mismatch negativity study.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2024Article
- Event-related potentials of stimuli inhibition and access in cross-modal distractor-induced blindness.PloS one · 2024Article
- The role of attention control in visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) studies.Experimental brain research · 2023Article
- Markov chains as a proxy for the predictive memory representations underlying mismatch negativity.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Belief in biological origin of race (racial essentialism) increases sensitivities to cultural category changes measured by ERP mismatch negativity (MMN).Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Functional Plasticity in Auditory and Visual Discrimination Processing in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness: An EEG Study.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this mini-review, we summarized the results of 12 visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) studies that attempted to use this component as a tool for investigating differences between non-clinical samples of participants as well as the possibility of automatic discrimination in the case of specific categories of visual stimuli. These studies investigated the effects of gender, the effects of long-term differences between the groups of participants (fitness, experience in different sports, and Internet addiction), and the effects of short-term states (mental fatigue and hypoxia), as well as the vMMN effect elicited by artworks as a special stimulus category.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.