ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2022
Role of Environment and Experimenter in Reproducibility of Behavioral Studies With Laboratory Mice.
Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- EthoPy provides an accessible platform for reproducible behavioral neuroscience.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- A narrative review of behavioral tests across mammalian models in neuroscience.Behavioral and brain functions : BBF · 2026Review
- Water-soluble fullerene derivatives mitigate cranial radiation-induced neuroinflammation and cognitive dysfunction.Biomedical microdevices · 2026Article
- Dissecting novel object exploration in a fully automated homecage-based novel object recognition test.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- IntelliCage protocols using incentive-disincentive dual motivation work with male as well as female mice and reveal sex differences in motivated behavior.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Rodent chronic variable stress procedures: A disjunction between stress entity and impact on behaviour.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2025Review
- Ecological Realism Accelerates Epigenetic Aging in Mice.Aging cell · 2025Article
- Effects of inter-individual variability in experimenters' sensitivity and training on behavioral assessment of animal models of vestibular disorders.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Behaviour Hallmarks in Alzheimer's Disease 5xFAD Mouse Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Appetitively motivated tasks in the IntelliCage reveal a higher motivational cost of spatial learning in male than female mice.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024Article
- The CAM Model-Q&A with Experts.Cancers · 2022Review
- Clicker Training Mice for Improved Compliance in the Catwalk Test.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Behavior is movement only but how to interpret it? Problems and pitfalls in translational neuroscience-a 40-year experience.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Behavioral phenotyping of mice has received a great deal of attention during the past three decades. However, there is still a pressing need to understand the variability caused by environmental and biological factors, human interference, and poorly standardized experimental protocols. The inconsistency of results is often attributed to the inter-individual difference between the experimenters and environmental conditions. The present work aims to dissect the combined influence of the experimenter and the environment on the detection of behavioral traits in two inbred strains most commonly used in behavioral genetics due to their contrasting phenotypes, the C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice. To this purpose, the elevated O-maze, the open field with object, the accelerating rotarod and the Barnes maze tests were performed by two experimenters in two diverse laboratory environments. Our findings confirm the well-characterized behavioral differences between these strains in exploratory behavior, motor performance, learning and memory. Moreover, the results demonstrate how the experimenter and the environment influence the behavioral tests with a variable-dependent effect, often with mutually exclusive contributions. In this context, our study highlights how both the experimenter and the environment can have an impact on the strain effect size without altering the direction of the conclusions. Importantly, the general agreement on the results is reached by converging evidence from multiple measures addressing the same trait. In conclusion, the present work elucidates the contribution of both the experimenter and the laboratory environment in the intricate field of reproducibility in mouse behavioral phenotyping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.