Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35250469›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Learn Less, Infer More: Learning in the Fourier Domain for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.

Junjie He, Lihui Wang, Ying Cao, Rongpin Wang, Yuemin Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Junjie HeKey Laboratory of Intelligent Medical Image Analysis and Precise Diagnosis of Guizhou Province, College of Computer Science and Technology, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China.
Lihui WangKey Laboratory of Intelligent Medical Image Analysis and Precise Diagnosis of Guizhou Province, College of Computer Science and Technology, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China.
Ying CaoKey Laboratory of Intelligent Medical Image Analysis and Precise Diagnosis of Guizhou Province, College of Computer Science and Technology, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China.
Rongpin WangInternational Exemplary Cooperation Base of Precision Imaging for Diagnosis and Treatment, Department of Radiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Yuemin ZhuCREATIS, IRP Metislab, University of Lyon, INSA Lyon, CNRS UMR 5220, Inserm U1294, Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) aims to evaluate the distribution of magnetic susceptibility from magnetic resonance phase measurements by solving the ill-conditioned dipole inversion problem. Removing the artifacts and preserving the anisotropy of tissue susceptibility simultaneously is still a challenge in QSM. To deal with this issue, a novel k-QSM network is proposed to resolve dipole inversion issues in QSM reconstruction. The k-QSM network converts the results obtained by truncated k-space division (TKD) into the Fourier domain as inputs. After passing through several convolutional and residual blocks, the ill-posed signals of TKD are corrected by making the network output close to the calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS)-labeled QSM. To evaluate the superiority of k-QSM, comparisons with several state-of-the-art methods are performed in terms of QSM artifacts removing, anisotropy preserving, generalization ability, and clinical applications. Compared to existing methods, the k-QSM achieves a 22.31% lower normalized root mean square error, 10.30% higher peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), 33.10% lower high-frequency error norm, and 1.06% higher structural similarity. In addition, the orientation-dependent susceptibility variation obtained by k-QSM is significant, verifying that k-QSM has the ability to preserve susceptibility anisotropy. When the trained models are tested on the dataset from different centers, our k-QSM shows a strong generalization ability with the highest PSNR. Moreover, by comparing the susceptibility maps between healthy controls and drug addicts with different methods, we found the proposed k-QSM is more sensitive to the susceptibility abnormality in the patients. The proposed k-QSM method learns less-only to fix the ill-posed signals of TKD, but infers more-both COSMOS-like and anisotropy-preserving QSM results. Its generalization ability and great sensitivity to susceptibility changes can make it a potential method for distinguishing some diseases.

Indexed as

deep learningdrug addictionFourier domainmagnetic susceptibility anisotropyquantitative susceptibility mapping

Identifiers

PMID35250469
PMCPMC8888664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.