Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35250367›Full record

ArticleEnvironment, development and sustainability2022

Social learning as an underlying mechanism for sustainability in neglected communities: The Brazilian case of the Bucket Revolution project.

Michelle Bonatti, Carla Erismann, Ayna Askhabalieva, Juliano Borba, Kamila Pope, Renata Reynaldo, Luca Eufemia, Ana Paula Turetta, Stefan Sieber

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environment, development and sustainability, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Michelle BonattiLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF E. V), 15374 Müncheberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8511-5365
Carla ErismannLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF E. V), 15374 Müncheberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0936-6423
Ayna AskhabalievaLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF E. V), 15374 Müncheberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1645-6577
Juliano BorbaLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF E. V), 15374 Müncheberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3619-2740
Kamila PopeLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF E. V), 15374 Müncheberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0248-1288
Renata ReynaldoInstitute of International Relations and Defense (IRID/UFRJ), Federal University of Rio de, Janeiro, 250 Pasteur Avenue, Campus Praia Vermelha, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7193-0112
Luca EufemiaLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF E. V), 15374 Müncheberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0211-8526
Ana Paula TurettaBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA Soils), Rio de Janeiro, 22460-000 Brazil.
Stefan SieberLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF E. V), 15374 Müncheberg, Germany.
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DELeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research · DEUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In neglected communities, waste and organic residues are not only a vector of several problems, like diseases and water pollution, but also a contributor to increasing forms of vulnerability and marginalization. At the same time, these communities also have presented innovative local initiatives and transformative learning about natural resources management that can be a vehicle for achieving more sustainable food systems. In the south of Brazil, community-based organic residue management has shown an extraordinary potential to improve food security and livelihoods for (≈1600) community members of a vulnerable urban territory. In this context, the overall objective of this article is (a) To better understand what Social Learning (SL) processes related to successful organic residues management in neglected communities exist and (b) To identify what knowledge systems are created in one empirical case. The study case is based on a communitarian waste management project, the Bucket Revolution Project (BRP). The analytical framework builds upon social learning theory and its triple-loop process focusing on four specific phenomena. The applied mixed-methods approach was made in four steps: 1. a focus group to investigate collective community issues; 2. semi-structured interviews to investigate specific and individual issues in the context of the BRP; 3. social media analysis to better understand the BRP narratives; and finally 4. participant observation in community and institutional meetings. Mainly using MaxQda software and coding indicators of SL, the data show that "Diversity of knowledge integration" is the most identified SL indicator in the interviews (52%). For BRP, identity development, community conditions improvement, and environment understanding are three key components of the knowledge system enhanced through an underlying process of social learning. Furthermore, the study also shows that there are endogenous and exogenous social learning processes at work.

Indexed as

Community-based food systemsEndogenous social learningSocio-ecological innovationTransformative learningTriple-loop learning

Identifiers

PMID35250367
PMCPMC8881555
OpenAlexW4214485936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.