Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35250246›Full record

ArticleCurrent psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)2022

The factor structure and measurement invariance of the PHQ-4 and the prevalence of depression and anxiety in a Southeast Asian context amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

Norman B Mendoza, Cherry E Frondozo, John Ian Wilzon T Dizon, Jet U Buenconsejo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Psychometric network analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in Paraguayan general population.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Norman B MendozaDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, The Education University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, SAR People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-0344-0709
Cherry E FrondozoDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, The Education University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, SAR People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-2001-1159
John Ian Wilzon T DizonDepartment of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, Angeles University Foundation, Angeles City, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-4912-7390
Jet U BuenconsejoDepartment of Special Education and Counselling, The Education University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, SAR People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-3777-8601
Education University of Hong Kong · HKAngeles University Foundation · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the psychometric properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) as an ultra-brief screener of depression and anxiety in the Philippines during the COVID-19 outbreak. Data from 4,524 non-clinical community respondents aged 18-73 years old was collected online between March and July 2020. We evaluated the screener's factor structure, measurement invariance, and criterion-related validity using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), multigroup CFA, and structural equation modeling (SEM), respectively. We also evaluated the accuracy of the PHQ-4 cut-off scores by comparing the them with the screeners' full scales (i.e., PHQ-9 and GAD-7). Using the cutoff scores of the screeners, we also estimated the prevalence rates of depression and anxiety. The PHQ-4 has good internal reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.82). The CFA results show that the two-factor model has an excellent model fit that is superior to the one-factor model. The two-factor model held through increasingly constrained multigroup CFA models across gender, age, and geographical location groups, demonstrating measurement invariance. The SEM model supported the PHQ-4's theoretical association to stress, negative affect, and positive affect, supporting the screener's criterion-related validity. In estimating prevalence rates, among those screened by the PHQ-4 cut-off scores for depression (

Indexed as

AnxietyCOVID-19DepressionMeasurement invariancePhilippinesPHQ-4

Identifiers

PMID35250246
PMCPMC8887801
OpenAlexW4214894750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.