Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35250181›Full record

ArticleNeural computing & applications2023

AI-enabled radiologist in the loop: novel AI-based framework to augment radiologist performance for COVID-19 chest CT medical image annotation and classification from pneumonia.

Hemant Ghayvat, Muhammad Awais, A K Bashir, Sharnil Pandya, Mohd Zuhair, Mamoon Rashid, Jamel Nebhen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural computing & applications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Chest X ray and cough sample based deep learning framework for accurate diagnosis of COVID-19.Computers & electrical engineering : an international journal · 2022
    Article
  7. Hypertuned Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Sign Language Recognition.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Hemant GhayvatInnovation Division, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Muhammad AwaisCenter for Intelligent Medical Electronics, Department of Electronic Engineering, School of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433 China.
A K BashirDepartment of Computing and Mathematics, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Sharnil PandyaSymbiosis Centre for Applied Artificial Intelligence, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra India.
Mohd ZuhairDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Nirma University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat India.
Mamoon RashidDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, Vishwakarma University, Pune, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8302-4571
Jamel NebhenCollege of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Fudan University · CNLinnaeus University · SEManchester Metropolitan University · GBNirma University · INPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SASymbiosis International University · INVishwakarma University

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A SARS-CoV-2 virus-specific reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test is usually used to diagnose COVID-19. However, this test requires up to 2 days for completion. Moreover, to avoid false-negative outcomes, serial testing may be essential. The availability of RT-PCR test kits is currently limited, highlighting the need for alternative approaches for the precise and rapid diagnosis of COVID-19. Patients suspected to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 can be assessed using chest CT scan images. However, CT images alone cannot be used for ruling out SARS-CoV-2 infection because individual patients may exhibit normal radiological results in the primary phases of the disease. A machine learning (ML)-based recognition and segmentation system was developed to spontaneously discover and compute infection areas in CT scans of COVID-19 patients. The computable assessment exhibited suitable performance for automatic infection region allocation. The ML models developed were suitable for the direct detection of COVID-19 (+). ML was confirmed to be a complementary diagnostic technique for diagnosing COVID-19(+) by forefront medical specialists. The complete manual delineation of COVID-19 often requires up to 225.5 min; however, the proposed RILML method decreases the delineation time to 7 min after four iterations of model updating.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCOVID-19, pneumoniaCTDiagnosis systemMedical image processingRadiologistX-ray

Identifiers

PMID35250181
PMCPMC8886865
OpenAlexW4214644352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.