ArticleApplied intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2022
New method for emergency decision making with an integrated regret theory-EDAS method in 2-tuple spherical linguistic environment.
Article in Applied intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decision Support Frameworks in Public Health Emergencies: A Systematic Review of Dynamic Models in Complex Contexts.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- Review
- A probabilistic linguistic opinion dynamics method based on the DeGroot model for emergency decision-making in response to COVID-19.Computers & industrial engineering · 2022Article
- Fermatean Fuzzy Schweizer-Sklar Operators and BWM-Entropy-Based Combined Compromise Solution Approach: An Application to Green Supplier Selection.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the frequent occurrence of various emergency events, emergency decision making (EDM) has become an important research focus recently and many studies have been conducted to decrease the negative impact of emergencies. Normally, it is essential for decision makers to make satisfactory and reasonable emergency decisions in the shortest possible time as inappropriate decisions may result in enormous economic losses and serious social consequences. To ensure that an emergency response can be made efficiently, we propose a new EDM method by integrating regret theory and evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) method within the 2-tuple spherical linguistic environment. First, the 2-tuple spherical linguistic term sets (TSLTSs) are employed by decision makers to express their uncertain and vague evaluation information on emergency alternatives. Then, an integrated EDM method based on regret theory and EDAS method is proposed to rank emergency alternatives and find out the optimal one. Besides, the criteria importance through inter-criteria correlation (CRITIC) method is used to determine criteria weights objectively in the EDM process. Finally, the proposed regret theory-EDAS method is applied to select the optimal response solution for a public health emergency in China. The superiority and practicality of the designed method are further justified through a comparative analysis with other EDM methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.