ArticleMaterials letters2022
Virus MIP-composites for SARS-CoV-2 detection in the aquatic environment.
Article in Materials letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analytical applications of molecularly imprinted polymers: a personal view.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Electrothermal Synthesis of Cell-Imprinted Polymer Coatings on Metallic Microwires for Bacterial Capture.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Nano-engineered biomimetic materials: toward point-of-care diagnosis of infectious diseases.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Review
- Electrochemical Biosensors by Means of Molecularly Imprinted Polymers (MIPs) Cortisol Recognition.Polymers · 2025Article
- Viruses in Wastewater-A Concern for Public Health and the Environment.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Biosensors for waterborne virus detection: Challenges and strategies.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2023Review
- Using Nanomaterials for SARS-CoV-2 Sensing via Electrochemical Techniques.Micromachines · 2023Review
- The role of electrochemical biosensors in SARS-CoV-2 detection: a bibliometrics-based analysis and review.RSC advances · 2022Review
- Biosensors forSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Molecularly Imprinted Polymer-Based Sensors for SARS-CoV-2: Where Are We Now?Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 is the virus responsible for causing the global COVID-19 pandemic. Identifying the presence of this virus in the environment could potentially improve the effectiveness of disease control measures. Environmental SARS-CoV-2 monitoring may become increasingly demanded in areas where the available testing methods are ineffective. In this study, we present an electrochemical polymer composites biosensor for measuring SARS-CoV-2 whole-virus particles in the environment. The sensitized layer was prepared from molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) composites of inactivated SARS-CoV-2. Testing demonstrated increased sensor signaling with SARS-CoV-2 specifically, while lower responses were observed to the negative controls, H5N1 influenza A virus and non-imprinted polymers (NIPs). This sensor detected SARS-CoV-2 at concentrations as low as 0.1 fM in buffer and samples prepared from reservoir water with a 3 log-scale linearity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.