Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35250121›Full record

ArticleJournal of business research2022

A look at the focus shift in innovation literature due to Covid-19 pandemic.

Xinxin Wang, Yong Qin, Zeshui Xu, Marinko Škare

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of business research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xinxin WangBusiness School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China.
Yong QinBusiness School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China.
Zeshui XuBusiness School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China.
Marinko ŠkareJuraj Dobrila University of Pula, Faculty of Economics and Tourism "Dr. Mijo Mirković", Preradovićeva 1/1, 52100 Pula, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the problems related to the development of innovation research in the field of business and economics and the change in their characteristics following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We compile a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of 17,277 pre-epidemic publications and 4,240 post-epidemic publications from the Web of Science. Using bibliometric methods and visualization tools, we present the changes in these publications following the COVID-19 pandemic, and identify the influential countries and regions, sources, and references, and obtain features of keywords over time. The results show that innovation research is rich in content, and involves a wide range; it has been focusing on emerging topics, such as those concerning low-carbon, innovation forms, and epidemic environments, following the COVID-19 pandemic. This study contributes to the body of knowledge on innovation, and helps to understand the features and structures of innovation research in business and economics.

Indexed as

Bibliometric analysisBusiness and economicsCOVID-19 pandemicInnovation literature

Identifiers

PMID35250121
PMCPMC8882404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.