Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35250069›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science and technology2022

Expected glycemic impact and probiotic stimulating effects of whole grain flours of buckwheat, quinoa, amaranth and chia.

Sultan Arslan-Tontul, Cihadiye Candal Uslu, Ceren Mutlu, Mustafa Erbaş

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sultan Arslan-TontulDepartment of Food Engineering, Agricultural Faculty, Selçuk University, 42130 Konya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1557-7948
Cihadiye Candal UsluFaculty of Health Science, Nutrition and Dietetics, Artvin Coruh University, 08100 Artvin, Turkey.
Ceren MutluDepartment of Food Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Akdeniz University, 07058 Antalya, Turkey.
Mustafa ErbaşDepartment of Food Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Akdeniz University, 07058 Antalya, Turkey.
Akdeniz University · TRArtvin Coruh University · TRBalıkesir University · TRSelçuk University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chia, amaranth, quinoa and buckwheat grains have been widely used in food formulations because of their high and balanced nutritional properties. Since all grains are not equally nutritious, there is a requirement for comparing the health-related effects and processing performance of a variety of whole grains. The expected glycemic index (eGI) flours of chia was determined to be quite low, and flours except quinoa can be classified as low GI foods. The highest resistant starch (RS) content (4.76 g/100 g) was found in amaranth flour, and it was followed by buckwheat (1.27 g/100 g). The amaranth had the highest stimulation effect on the growth of probiotics and increased the count of

Indexed as

Glycemic indexProbioticPseudocerealsResistant starch

Identifiers

PMID35250069
PMCPMC8882750
OpenAlexW3166700232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.