Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35249886›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2022

Evaluating User Feedback for an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-Based Mental Health App (Wysa): Qualitative Thematic Analysis.

Tanya Malik, Adrian Jacques Ambrose, Chaitali Sinha

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07167056 (Artificial Intelligence-Powered Support For Quality Of Life Improvement In Patients With Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07167056 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Artificial Intelligence-Powered Support For Quality Of Life Improvement In Patients With Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorCase Comprehensive Cancer CenterRan2025 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsCancerArmsStandard of Care Psychotherapy, WYSA App
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tanya MalikWysa Inc, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7508-0330
Adrian Jacques AmbroseVagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0439-6968
Chaitali SinhaWysa Inc, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8919-7134

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital mental health apps are rapidly becoming a common source of accessible support across the world, but their effectiveness is often influenced by limited helpfulness and engagement.

objectiveThis study's primary objective was to analyze feedback content to understand users' experiences with engaging with a digital mental health app. As a secondary objective, an exploratory analysis captured the types of mental health app users.

methodsThis study utilized a user-led approach to understanding factors for engagement and helpfulness in digital mental health by analyzing feedback (n=7929) reported on Google Play Store about Wysa, a mental health app (1-year period). The analysis of keywords in the user feedback categorized and evaluated the reported user experience into the core domains of acceptability, usability, usefulness, and integration. The study also captured key deficits and strengths of the app and explored salient characteristics of the types of users who benefit from accessible digital mental health support.

resultsThe analysis of user feedback found the app to be overwhelmingly positively reviewed (6700/7929, 84.50% 5-star rating). The themes of engaging exercises, interactive interface, and artificial intelligence (AI) conversational ability indicated the acceptability of the app, while the nonjudgmentality and ease of conversation highlighted its usability. The app's usefulness was portrayed by themes such as improvement in mental health, convenient access, and cognitive restructuring exercises. Themes of privacy and confidentiality underscored users' preference for the integrated aspects of the app. Further analysis revealed 4 predominant types of individuals who shared app feedback on the store.

conclusionsUsers reported therapeutic elements of a comfortable, safe, and supportive environment through using the digital mental health app. Digital mental health apps may expand mental health access to those unable to access traditional forms of mental health support and treatments.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceCBTcognitive behavioral therapydigital mental healthuser reviews

Identifiers

PMID35249886
PMCPMC9044157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.