ArticleJournal of healthcare quality research
[Evaluation of contingency plans in the care of patients in intensive care units in the COVID-19 pandemic].
Article in Journal of healthcare quality research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe expansion of intensive care areas has been one of the most significant measures in this forced adaptation to the evolution of the different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective is to evaluate the deployment of contingency plans in the care of patients admitted to intensive care units during the period from March 19 to April 20, 2020, in a public hospital, reference for 300,000 inhabitants belonging to the Galician Health Service. MATERIALS AND
methodsQualitative research from focus groups, with systematic sampling. Based on the adaptation to the health environment of the 10 measures recommended by Deloitte to face a pandemic, an evaluation was carried out by the quality unit of the Health Area. As outcome indicators, the number of COVID-19 patients, % of patients admitted to hospital, % patients admitted to intensive care units, as well as the number of deaths from COVID-19, were evaluated in seven health areas in the period March 19 to April 20, 2020.
resultsThe qualitative evaluation identified 2 areas for improvement (communication and risk assessment) of the 10 recommended measures. The Health Area has the lowest relative (2.6%) and absolute (16) rate of deceased patients, as well as the lowest relative (7.9%) and absolute (24) rate of patients admitted to intensive services for COVID-19. The infection rate in professionals has been 4.4%.
conclusionsThe simplicity and identification of areas for improvement added to the low consumption of resources are strengths of this proposal. This self-assessment can be helpful in identifying areas for improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.