Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35249576›Full record

ArticleBJPsych bulletin2023

Nasogastric tube feeding under physical restraint on paediatric wards: ethical, legal and practical considerations regarding this lifesaving intervention.

Sarah J Fuller, Simon Chapman, Emma Cave, James Druce-Perkins, Poppy Daniels, Jacinta Tan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych bulletin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah J FullerAdvanced Specialist Eating Disorders Dietitian, East London NHS Foundation Trust and Child; and Child and Adolescent Mental Health Department, Imperial College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2863-158X
Simon ChapmanConsultant in Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, King's College London, UK.
Emma CaveProfessor of Healthcare Law, Department of Paediatrics, Durham University, UK.
James Druce-PerkinsHighly Specialist Dietitian, Child and Adolescent Mental Health Department, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board.
Poppy Danielsexpert by experience.
Jacinta TanConsultant Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust; and Senior Clinical Research Fellow, Department of Psychiatry, Oxford University, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eating disorders have the highest mortality rate of any psychiatric condition. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of patients who have required medical stabilisation on paediatric wards has increased significantly. Likewise, the number of patients who have required medical stabilisation against their will as a lifesaving intervention has increased. This paper highlights a fictional case study aiming to explore the legal, ethical and practical considerations a trainee should be aware of. By the end of this article, readers will be more aware of this complex issue and how it might be managed, as well as the impact it can have on the patient, their family and ward staff.

Indexed as

ethicslegalNasogastric tube feedingpaediatricsrestraint

Identifiers

PMID35249576
PMCPMC10063984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.