ArticlePharmaceutical medicine2022
Medical Affairs Transformation in Specialty Pharma: Next-Level Collaboration at the Core.
Article in Pharmaceutical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Embracing Digital as a Paradigm Shift in Medical Affairs.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2026Review
- The Evolution of Medical Affairs Central Teams: Shaping Strategic Action and Driving Healthcare Transformation Through Scientific Interaction.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2026Article
- Pioneering the Future of Medical Affairs: A Strategic Transformation to Meet the Spanish Healthcare Ecosystem's Evolving Trends.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2025Article
- Visionary Health Architects and Leaders: The Strategic Role of Medical Advisors in Modern Pharma.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2025Review
- Understanding the National Healthcare Ecosystem to Position Medical Affairs as a Strategic Element: Lessons Learned from AstraZeneca Spain.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2025Article
- The Evolution of In-Field Medical Affairs: Introducing the Strategic Scientific Advisor.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmaceutical companies with a medical mindset and an empowered Medical Affairs function are well equipped to meet the needs and expectations of patients and society. Yet, as capacity to understand and serve those needs accelerates, so too do expectations. Evidence-based practice, without delay, is expected throughout the development and delivery of medicine, healthcare, and information, and potential sources of evidence are legion. To keep pace and go beyond, to innovate, requires efficiencies. Not the disguised cutbacks of political language, but the collaborative constructive efficiencies of shared learning, forming new evidence bases for further progress. Here, we describe the first year of a medical transformation process at a global mid-sized pharmaceutical company. Beginning with a broad review designed to leverage collective intelligence and focus on meaningful outcomes for patients, this process examined and reshaped the structure, culture, and tools of the medical organization and its interactions within and outside the company. We report the findings of the diagnostic phase, outline the solutions implemented to date, and anticipate the next steps in this dynamic evolving journey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.