Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35249153›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2022

Pregnant women with immune mediated inflammatory diseases who discontinue biologics have higher rates of disease flare.

Kenneth D Allen, Miranda K Kiefer, Madalina Butnariu, Anita Afzali

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Obstetric outcomes of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kenneth D AllenDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Miranda K KieferDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Madalina ButnariuDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Anita AfzaliDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA. Anita.Afzali@osumc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4397-9576
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsBiologic agents have revolutionized treatment of immune mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). However, despite the benefits of treatment, there is limited data on its use during pregnancy leading to significant variation in practices. We evaluated maternal, neonatal, and disease-related outcomes in pregnant women with IMIDs, comparing those with biologic exposure during pregnancy to those without exposure. Our hypothesis was that there would be no difference in outcomes between the two groups.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single tertiary care center including women with Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), or psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis (PS/PsA) who delivered between 2010 and 2018 at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. Conditions were identified by ICD-9/ICD-10 code and confirmed by chart review. Demographic data, pregnancy outcomes and disease-related data were collected.

resultsThere were 338 pregnancies including 100 with CD, 74 with UC, 15 with AS, 61 with RA, and 90 with PS/PsA. 23% of IMID patients had biologic exposure (biologic use within 3 months of conception) and 18% continued therapy during pregnancy. Those with biologic exposure had increased risk of post-partum disease flare (OR 3.44; 95% CI 1.29, 9.15) and were less likely to breastfeed (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.23, 0.87). In subgroup analysis of patients with IBD, those with biologic exposure also had increased risk of post-partum flare (OR 4.55; 95% CI 1.27, 16.35). Maternal and neonatal pregnancy outcomes were similar.

conclusionAmong pregnant women with IMIDs, those that continued biologics during pregnancy had increased rates of major infection, disease related hospital admission, glucocorticoid use, and disease flare within 6 months post-partum, without any significant change in maternal or neonatal outcomes.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, PsoriaticArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsColitis, UlcerativeCrohn DiseaseInflammatory Bowel DiseasesSpondylitis, AnkylosingFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnant PeopleRetrospective StudiesSymptom Flare UpAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsAdalimumabAnti-TNFInflammatory bowel diseaseInfliximab

Identifiers

PMID35249153
OpenAlexW4220796108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.