Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35249112›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

Remote cognitive assessment in severe mental illness: a scoping review.

Katie M Lavigne, Geneviève Sauvé, Delphine Raucher-Chéné, Synthia Guimond, Tania Lecomte, Christopher R Bowie, Mahesh Menon, Shalini Lal, Todd S Woodward, Michael D Bodnar and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readScoping Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07309302 (Psychosocial Determinants and Impact of a Synchronous Remote Cognitive Remediation Program on Individuals With Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07309302 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Psychosocial Determinants and Impact of a Synchronous Remote Cognitive Remediation Program on Individuals With Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversité du Québec a MontréalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled64ConditionsPost Traumatic Stress Disorder PTSDArmsCognitive Remediation Training, Control Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Katie M LavigneDepartment of psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3918-691X
Geneviève SauvéDepartment of psychology, University of Quebec in Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Delphine Raucher-ChénéDepartment of psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5663-4454
Synthia GuimondDepartment of psychiatry, University of Ottawa, The Royal's Institute of Mental Health Research, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1582-725X
Tania LecomteDepartment of psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0340-3759
Christopher R BowieDepartment of psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Mahesh MenonDepartment of psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Shalini LalSchool of Rehabilitation, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Todd S WoodwardDepartment of psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Michael D BodnarDepartment of psychiatry, University of Ottawa, The Royal's Institute of Mental Health Research, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Martin LepageDepartment of psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. martin.lepage@mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4345-6502
McGill University · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CACentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRQueen's University · CAUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many individuals living with severe mental illness, such as schizophrenia, present cognitive deficits and reasoning biases negatively impacting clinical and functional trajectories. Remote cognitive assessment presents many opportunities for advancing research and treatment but has yet to be widely used in psychiatric populations. We conducted a scoping review of remote cognitive assessment in severe mental illness to provide an overview of available measures and guide best practices. Overall, 34 studies (n = 20,813 clinical participants) were reviewed and remote measures, psychometrics, facilitators, barriers, and future directions were synthesized using a logic model. We identified 82 measures assessing cognition in severe mental illness across 11 cognitive domains and four device platforms. Remote measures were generally comparable to traditional versions, though psychometric properties were infrequently reported. Facilitators included standardized procedures and wider recruitment, whereas barriers included imprecise measure adaptations, technology inaccessibility, low patient engagement, and poor digital literacy. Our review identified several remote cognitive measures in psychiatry across all cognitive domains. However, there is a need for more rigorous validation of these measures and consideration of potentially influential factors, such as sex and gender. We provide recommendations for conducting remote cognitive assessment in psychiatry and fostering high-quality research using digital technologies.

Identifiers

PMID35249112
PMCPMC8897553
OpenAlexW4220741138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.