Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35249100›Full record

SynthesisModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2022

Ki-67 assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Systematic review and meta-analysis of manual vs. digital pathology scoring.

Claudio Luchini, Liron Pantanowitz, Volkan Adsay, Sylvia L Asa, Pietro Antonini, Ilaria Girolami, Nicola Veronese, Alessia Nottegar, Sara Cingarlini, Luca Landoni and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Toward Optimizing the Impact of Digital Pathology and Augmented Intelligence on Issues of Diagnosis, Grading, Staging, and Classification.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Claudio LuchiniDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. claudio.luchini@univr.it.ORCID 0000-0003-4901-4908
Liron PantanowitzDepartment of Pathology & Clinical Labs, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8182-5503
Volkan AdsayDepartment of Pathology, Koç University Hospital and Koç University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Istanbul, Turkey.
Sylvia L AsaUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8418-5054
Pietro AntoniniDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Ilaria GirolamiDivision of Pathology, San Maurizio Central Hospital, Bolzano, Italy.
Nicola VeroneseDepartment of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Alessia NottegarPathology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (AOUI), Verona, Italy.
Sara CingarliniDepartment of Medicine, Section of Oncology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Luca LandoniDepartment of Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2474-3496
Lodewijk A BrosensDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1341-8994
Anna V VerschuurDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8085-1355
Paola MattioloDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5601-0879
Antonio PeaDepartment of Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Andrea MafficiniDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7471-3121
Michele MilellaDepartment of Medicine, Section of Oncology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Muhammad K NiaziCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1278-7512
Metin N GurcanCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2421-8229
Albino EccherPathology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (AOUI), Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9992-5550
Ian A CreeInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, IARC, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5007-9456
Aldo ScarpaDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. aldo.scarpa@univr.it.ORCID 0000-0003-1678-739X
University of Verona · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona · ITUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLWake Forest University · USCentre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRKoç University · TROspedale di Bolzano · ITUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001420 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARD, JAMY D, FOLEY, KRISTIE L · 2015 to 2023
$32.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001420World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ki-67 assessment is a key step in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) from all anatomic locations. Several challenges exist related to quantifying the Ki-67 proliferation index due to lack of method standardization and inter-reader variability. The application of digital pathology coupled with machine learning has been shown to be highly accurate and reproducible for the evaluation of Ki-67 in NENs. We systematically reviewed all published studies on the subject of Ki-67 assessment in pancreatic NENs (PanNENs) employing digital image analysis (DIA). The most common advantages of DIA were improvement in the standardization and reliability of Ki-67 evaluation, as well as its speed and practicality, compared to the current gold standard approach of manual counts from captured images, which is cumbersome and time consuming. The main limitations were attributed to higher costs, lack of widespread availability (as of yet), operator qualification and training issues (if it is not done by pathologists), and most importantly, the drawback of image algorithms counting contaminating non-neoplastic cells and other signals like hemosiderin. However, solutions are rapidly developing for all of these challenging issues. A comparative meta-analysis for DIA versus manual counting shows very high concordance (global coefficient of concordance: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.83-0.98) between these two modalities. These findings support the widespread adoption of validated DIA methods for Ki-67 assessment in PanNENs, provided that measures are in place to ensure counting of only tumor cells either by software modifications or education of non-pathologist operators, as well as selection of standard regions of interest for analysis. NENs, being cellular and monotonous neoplasms, are naturally more amenable to Ki-67 assessment. However, lessons of this review may be applicable to other neoplasms where proliferation activity has become an integral part of theranostic evaluation including breast, brain, and hematolymphoid neoplasms.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCell ProliferationFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKi-67 AntigenReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkers, TumorKi-67 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID35249100
PMCPMC9174054
OpenAlexW4220860066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.